Technical Leadership & Consulting
A senior engineer in the room
Somebody on your side of the table when a supplier, a budget or an architecture decision needs a second informed opinion.

Photo: Pexels / Pixabay 
Photo: tungnguyen0905 / Pixabay
Selected work demonstrating this service.
-
Overhauled internal processes, saving 8,000 hours
Overhauled internal processes, saving 8,000 hours by improving software architecture, systems, and scheduling efficiency.
-
Streamlined CI/CD processes, saving 4,000 hours
Streamlined CI/CD processes, saving 4,000 hours by introducing automation in software development pipelines.
-
Set a zero‑warnings bar across six languages
Set a zero‑warnings quality bar across six languages — Go, TypeScript, SQL, Python, Shell and Markdown — enforced by pre‑commit hooks.
-
Built a test suite across Go, SQL and browser
Built a layered automated test suite — 981 Go tests, 543 frontend and browser specs, 494 SQL behavioural tests — with mutation testing, property‑based tests and an accessibility gate.
-
Built a 268‑check guard engine for the repo
Built the repository's guard engine — 268 registered commit checks, 277 lint rules and 15 custom ESLint rules — plus 146 tests of the guards themselves, so the build holds the standard, not review.
-
A safety net that no longer costs half an hour
Cut the site's browser‑driven quality gate from 1,636 seconds to 615 by scheduling its checks longest‑first through a worker pool bounded to four lanes, after measuring that alphabetical order cost 320 seconds against 224.
-
Linted the 10,242‑line quality gate itself
Brought 10,242 lines of quality‑gate JavaScript under a formatter and a linter after establishing it was the largest body of code in the repository and the only one nothing read, fixing 13 findings and suppressing none.
-
Held the generator to 981 tests and 92% coverage
Held the generator to 981 test cases at a 92% branch‑coverage floor with warnings treated as failures, and asserted idempotence by running the whole build pipeline twice from an empty file and requiring the second pass to change nothing.
-
Enabled every linter rule as an error
Selected every rule the Python linter has as an error, working through 1,815 findings to reach zero, with each of the few exemptions carrying a written reason and two of them backed by a checker instead of a comment.
-
Wrote tests for the checkers themselves
Wrote tests for the checkers themselves after establishing that a checker fed only clean input will one day report clean because it read nothing — planting a misspelling to confirm the spell‑check finds it, and taking an id range from the database rather than from a number in the test.
-
Found the hooks and the gate disagreeing
Found the commit hooks and the quality gate running different checks while a document promised they were the same, by comparing the two lists in a test — the five that only ever ran by hand were the ones reading the CV prose.
-
Took the test suite to 8.9 seconds
Took the test suite from six tests over a sixty‑second limit to 135 passing in 8.9 seconds by profiling the main thread and removing the two calls it sat inside for 3,989 samples out of 4,017.
-
Held 4 repositories to one history standard
Held four repositories to one history standard — conventional, emoji‑free, no attribution trailers, enforced by a commit‑message hook — alongside 48 instruction documents that govern how the work is done.
If this is the work you need done, the next step is a conversation.
Tell us the problem and we will tell you honestly whether we are the right people.

